EVA Foam vs PE Foam: Custom Case Insert Comparison 2026
Foam insert material comparison. Density, water resistance, cost, applications for B2B cases.
Custom foam inserts are critical for protective case value. EVA (Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate) and PE (Polyethylene) are the two most common materials. This guide compares 10 dimensions to help B2B buyers select the right foam.
Comparison Table
| Property | EVA Foam (Closed-Cell) | PE Foam (Polyethylene) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m³) | 30-200 (typical 50-100) | 25-80 (typical 35-50) | EVA: high density |
| Water Absorption | < 1% (closed-cell) | 1-3% (cross-linked: < 1%) | Both: closed-cell low |
| Compression Set (50% recover) | Good (5-10% permanent) | Excellent (2-5% permanent) | PE: long-term shape |
| Tear Strength | Fair (1.5-3.0 kN/m) | Good (3-5 kN/m) | PE: rough handling |
| Temperature Range | -40 to +80°C | -50 to +90°C | PE: wider range |
| Chemical Resistance | Good (acids, alkalis) | Excellent (oils, fuels) | PE: oils/fuels |
| Custom Cut Cost (per case) | $15-30 (laser) | $10-20 (water jet) | PE: 25% cheaper |
| Density Cost (per kg) | $8-15 | $5-10 | PE: lower cost |
| Color Options | Black, gray, blue, custom | Black, white, custom | Similar |
| Eco-Friendliness | Recyclable, ROHS compliant | Recyclable, ROHS compliant | Similar |
| Best Applications | Camera, medical, electronics | Tools, military, industrial | Match use |
Why Choose KeXinMaterials
- 18,000㎡ factory, 60+ machines, 20+ patents
- ISO9001, ROHS, CE, SGS, IP67 certified
- OEM/ODM since 2014, 30-45 day delivery
- EXW Shenzhen/FOB Ningbo, T/T 30% deposit
- kexin@beeaa.com | +86 13590555309 | WhatsApp same